Environmental (E) Resources
Environmental (E) Resources
Resources organized by the Planetary Boundaries Framework (Rockström et al., Stockholm Resilience Centre).
The planetary boundaries framework defines a safe operating space for humanity based on nine critical Earth system processes. Six of nine boundaries have been transgressed, indicating that Earth is now well outside the safe operating space for humanity.
Framework Origin: Rockström, J., et al. (2009). “A safe operating space for humanity.” Nature, 461, 472-475.
Updated: Steffen, W., et al. (2015). “Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet.” Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
Framework Overview
| Boundary | Status | Control Variable | Current Value | Boundary Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🌡️ Climate Change | 🔴 Transgressed | Atmospheric CO₂ concentration | 417 ppm | 350 ppm |
| 🦋 Biodiversity Loss | 🔴 Transgressed | Extinction rate | >100 E/MSY | <10 E/MSY |
| 🌳 Land-System Change | 🔴 Transgressed | Cropland as % of ice-free land | 12% | <15% |
| 💧 Freshwater Use | 🟡 Regional | Global freshwater consumption | 2,600 km³/yr | <4,000 km³/yr |
| 🔬 Biogeochemical Flows | 🔴 Transgressed | N & P flows to oceans | N: 150 Tg/yr | N: 62 Tg/yr |
| 🌊 Ocean Acidification | 🟢 Safe | Aragonite saturation state | Ωarag = 2.9 | Ωarag ≥ 2.75 |
| ☁️ Aerosol Loading | ⚪ Uncertain | Aerosol optical depth (AOD) | Regional | Not quantified |
| 🛡️ Ozone Depletion | 🟢 Safe | Stratospheric O₃ concentration | 283 DU | >275 DU |
| ⚗️ Novel Entities | 🔴 Transgressed | Chemical pollution | High | Not quantified |
| Legend: 🔴 Transgressed | 🟡 Regional/Uncertain | 🟢 Within safe limits | ⚪ Not yet quantified |
🌡️ 1. Climate Change (Transgressed)
Status: HIGH RISK - Boundary transgressed
Control Variables: Atmospheric CO₂ concentration, radiative forcing
Current State: 417 ppm CO₂ (vs. 350 ppm boundary)
Scientific Definition
Climate change refers to long-term shifts in global temperatures and weather patterns driven by increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.
Key Topics
- Greenhouse gas emissions (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, F-gases)
- Global temperature rise and warming scenarios
- Carbon budgets and net-zero pathways
- Climate tipping points
- Mitigation and adaptation strategies
Related ESG Standards
- IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures
- TCFD: Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
- SASB: Climate risk metrics by industry
- GRI 305: Emissions
Resources
- Videos on Climate Change
- Academic Research on Climate Science
- Climate Standards & Frameworks
- Climate Regulations
Simon Mak’s Books
- Carbon Accounting in Practice: Technical guide to GHG measurement
- Climate Risk Quantification in Practice: Financial impact of climate change
- Carbon Credits Made Simple: Voluntary carbon markets
Explore Climate Change Resources →
🦋 2. Biodiversity Loss (Transgressed)
Status: HIGH RISK - Boundary transgressed
Control Variable: Extinction rate (extinctions per million species-years, E/MSY)
Current State: >100 E/MSY (vs. <10 E/MSY boundary)
Scientific Definition
Biodiversity loss refers to the decline in the variety and variability of life on Earth, measured by species extinction rates, population declines, and genetic diversity loss.
Key Topics
- Species extinction and endangerment
- Habitat loss and fragmentation
- Ecosystem degradation
- Invasive species
- Conservation strategies
- Biodiversity metrics and monitoring
Related ESG Standards
- TNFD: Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- GRI 304: Biodiversity
- SASB: Biodiversity impacts (sector-specific)
- SBTN: Science Based Targets for Nature
Resources
Simon Mak’s Books
- TNFD Made Simple: Practical guide to nature-related disclosures
- Biodiversity and Ecology Service Accounting: Quantifying biodiversity impacts
Explore Biodiversity Resources →
🌳 3. Land-System Change (Transgressed)
Status: HIGH RISK - Boundary transgressed
Control Variable: Cropland as percentage of ice-free land
Current State: 12% (approaching 15% boundary)
Scientific Definition
Land-system change refers to the conversion of natural ecosystems (forests, wetlands, grasslands) to human-dominated land uses (agriculture, urban areas).
Key Topics
- Deforestation and forest degradation
- Agricultural expansion
- Urbanization
- Land degradation and desertification
- Sustainable land management
- Reforestation and restoration
Related ESG Standards
- TNFD: Land-use dependencies and impacts
- GRI 304: Biodiversity (includes land use)
- SASB: Land use and ecological impacts
- REDD+: Reducing emissions from deforestation
Resources
Simon Mak’s Books
- TNFD Made Simple: Land-use assessment
- Biodiversity and Ecology Service Accounting: Land-use impacts on ecosystems
Explore Land-System Change Resources →
💧 4. Freshwater Use (Regionally Transgressed)
Status: MODERATE RISK - Regional boundaries transgressed
Control Variable: Global freshwater consumption
Current State: 2,600 km³/yr (vs. <4,000 km³/yr global boundary)
Scientific Definition
Freshwater use refers to human consumption of renewable freshwater resources from rivers, lakes, and aquifers. While the global boundary is not transgressed, many regions face severe water stress.
Key Topics
- Water scarcity and stress
- Water footprint and virtual water
- Water quality and pollution
- Water-energy-food nexus
- Water governance and allocation
- Sustainable water management
Related ESG Standards
- CDP Water: Water security disclosure
- GRI 303: Water and Effluents
- SASB: Water management (sector-specific)
- Alliance for Water Stewardship: AWS Standard
Resources
Simon Mak’s Books
- Water Accounting in Practice: Comprehensive water footprint methodology
Explore Freshwater Use Resources →
🔬 5. Biogeochemical Flows (Transgressed)
Status: HIGH RISK - Boundary transgressed
Control Variables: Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) flows to oceans
Current State: N: 150 Tg/yr (vs. 62 Tg/yr boundary), P: 14 Tg/yr (vs. 11 Tg/yr boundary)
Scientific Definition
Biogeochemical flows refer to the cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus through Earth systems. Excessive flows from fertilizer use cause eutrophication, dead zones, and ecosystem collapse.
Key Topics
- Nitrogen and phosphorus pollution
- Eutrophication and algal blooms
- Agricultural runoff
- Fertilizer efficiency
- Nutrient recovery and recycling
- Circular nutrient management
Related ESG Standards
- GRI 306: Effluents and Waste
- SASB: Water quality (agriculture, food sectors)
- TNFD: Nutrient pollution impacts
Resources
- Videos on Biogeochemical Flows
- Academic Research on Nutrient Cycles
- Agricultural Standards
- Water Quality Regulations
Simon Mak’s Books
- Water Accounting in Practice: Nutrient pollution accounting
- Biodiversity and Ecology Service Accounting: Ecosystem impacts of nutrient pollution
Explore Biogeochemical Flows Resources →
🌊 6. Ocean Acidification (Within Safe Limits)
Status: LOW RISK - Within safe operating space
Control Variable: Aragonite saturation state (Ωarag)
Current State: Ωarag = 2.9 (vs. ≥2.75 boundary)
Scientific Definition
Ocean acidification refers to the decrease in ocean pH caused by absorption of atmospheric CO₂. While still within the boundary, continued CO₂ emissions threaten marine ecosystems.
Key Topics
- Ocean pH and carbonate chemistry
- Coral reef bleaching
- Marine ecosystem impacts
- Shellfish and calcifying organisms
- Ocean carbon sink capacity
- Marine conservation
Related ESG Standards
- TNFD: Marine ecosystem dependencies
- GRI 304: Biodiversity (marine)
- SASB: Marine resources (fisheries, aquaculture)
Resources
- Videos on Ocean Acidification
- Academic Research on Ocean Chemistry
- Marine Standards
- Marine Regulations
Simon Mak’s Books
- TNFD Made Simple: Marine ecosystem assessment
- Climate Risk Quantification in Practice: Ocean-related climate risks
Explore Ocean Acidification Resources →
☁️ 7. Atmospheric Aerosol Loading (Not Yet Quantified)
Status: UNCERTAIN - Boundary not yet quantified globally
Control Variable: Aerosol optical depth (AOD)
Current State: Regional variations, no global boundary established
Scientific Definition
Atmospheric aerosol loading refers to the concentration of fine particles (PM2.5, PM10) in the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources. Aerosols affect climate, air quality, and human health.
Key Topics
- Air pollution and particulate matter
- Aerosol-climate interactions
- Health impacts of air pollution
- Emission sources (industry, transport, agriculture)
- Air quality monitoring
- Pollution control technologies
Related ESG Standards
- GRI 305: Emissions (includes air pollutants)
- SASB: Air quality (sector-specific)
- WHO: Air quality guidelines
Resources
Simon Mak’s Books
- Carbon Accounting in Practice: Air pollutant emissions
Explore Atmospheric Aerosol Resources →
🛡️ 8. Stratospheric Ozone Depletion (Within Safe Limits)
Status: LOW RISK - Within safe operating space (recovering)
Control Variable: Stratospheric O₃ concentration
Current State: 283 DU (vs. >275 DU boundary)
Scientific Definition
Stratospheric ozone depletion refers to the thinning of the ozone layer caused by ozone-depleting substances (ODS). The Montreal Protocol has successfully phased out most ODS, and the ozone layer is recovering.
Key Topics
- Ozone-depleting substances (CFCs, HCFCs, halons)
- Montreal Protocol success story
- Ozone layer recovery
- UV radiation and health impacts
- Kigali Amendment (HFCs)
Related ESG Standards
- GRI 305: Emissions (ODS)
- Montreal Protocol: International treaty
Resources
Simon Mak’s Books
- ESG Reporting Made Simple: Ozone-depleting substance reporting
Explore Ozone Depletion Resources →
⚗️ 9. Novel Entities (Transgressed)
Status: HIGH RISK - Boundary transgressed
Control Variable: Chemical pollution, plastics, microplastics, novel organisms
Current State: High levels of pollution, boundary not precisely quantified
Scientific Definition
Novel entities refer to new substances, materials, and organisms introduced by humans that have the potential to cause unwanted geophysical and/or biological effects. This includes plastics, chemicals, GMOs, and nanomaterials.
Key Topics
- Plastic pollution and microplastics
- Chemical pollution (PFAS, pesticides, heavy metals)
- Persistent organic pollutants (POPs)
- Pharmaceutical pollution
- Nanomaterials and emerging contaminants
- Circular economy and waste management
Related ESG Standards
- GRI 306: Waste
- GRI 301: Materials
- SASB: Waste management (sector-specific)
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Circular economy framework
Resources
- Videos on Plastic Pollution
- Academic Research on Chemical Pollution
- Circular Economy Standards
- Chemical Regulations
Simon Mak’s Books
- Plastic Accounting in Practice: Comprehensive plastic footprint methodology
Explore Novel Entities Resources →
Framework Integration with ESG Standards
Mapping to Major Standards
| Planetary Boundary | IFRS S2 | TNFD | GRI | SASB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Climate Change | ✅ Core | ✅ Climate | ✅ 305 | ✅ All sectors |
| Biodiversity | ⚠️ Indirect | ✅ Core | ✅ 304 | ⚠️ Select sectors |
| Land-System Change | ⚠️ Indirect | ✅ Core | ✅ 304 | ⚠️ Select sectors |
| Freshwater Use | ⚠️ Indirect | ✅ Core | ✅ 303 | ✅ Water-intensive sectors |
| Biogeochemical Flows | ❌ Not covered | ✅ Pollution | ✅ 306 | ⚠️ Agriculture |
| Ocean Acidification | ⚠️ Indirect | ✅ Marine | ✅ 304 | ⚠️ Marine sectors |
| Aerosol Loading | ❌ Not covered | ❌ Not covered | ✅ 305 | ⚠️ Select sectors |
| Ozone Depletion | ❌ Not covered | ❌ Not covered | ✅ 305 | ❌ Not covered |
| Novel Entities | ❌ Not covered | ✅ Pollution | ✅ 301, 306 | ⚠️ Select sectors |
| Legend: ✅ Comprehensive coverage | ⚠️ Partial coverage | ❌ Not covered |
Why Planetary Boundaries?
Scientific Rigor
The planetary boundaries framework is grounded in Earth system science and represents the consensus of leading climate and environmental scientists.
Comprehensive Coverage
The nine boundaries capture the full range of environmental pressures on Earth systems, from climate to biodiversity to chemical pollution.
Clear Thresholds
Each boundary defines a quantitative threshold beyond which risks increase significantly. This provides clear targets for corporate action.
Integration with ESG
The framework aligns with and complements major ESG standards (TNFD, IFRS S2, GRI), providing a scientific foundation for environmental reporting.
Academic References
Key Papers
-
Rockström, J., et al. (2009). “A safe operating space for humanity.” Nature, 461, 472-475.
-
Steffen, W., et al. (2015). “Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet.” Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
-
Richardson, K., et al. (2023). “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries.” Science Advances, 9(37), eadh2458.
-
Persson, L., et al. (2022). “Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities.” Environmental Science & Technology, 56(3), 1510-1521.
Research Institutions
- Stockholm Resilience Centre: Home of the planetary boundaries framework
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research: Climate and Earth system research
- IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- IPBES: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Related Pages
- Social (S) Resources - Stakeholder Theory framework
- Governance (G) Resources - Agency + Stakeholder Theory framework
- ESG Standards - Official frameworks and guidelines
- Academic Research - Peer-reviewed papers
- Simon Mak’s Books - Practical guides and technical manuals
Disclaimer: The planetary boundaries framework represents current scientific understanding and is subject to ongoing research and refinement. Boundary values and status assessments are based on the latest published research (2023).
Sources: Stockholm Resilience Centre, peer-reviewed scientific literature, IPCC, IPBES. </small>